Tag Archives: jeffrey sprecher

The Man Who Is Transforming Equities Market Structure: Dark Pool Killer Targets Maker-Taker

For those who might have missed it, Jeffrey Sprecher (pictured above), the CEO of Intercontinental Exchange, which owns the NYSE, is determined to put the genie back in the bottle by turning back the market structure changes that have taken place over the past 10 years, including the surge of “dark pools” hosted by leading investment banks which internalized all institutional order flow and the dominant use of complex “maker-taker” fee models that exchanges have provided as a means of capturing order flow to their venues.

genie-bottle-blue-smokeAs reported by the WSJ  2 days ago, Sprecher has been negotiating with all of the major banks that operate dark pools and offering a %90 reduction on NYSE exchange fees if those banks will send the order flow back to the NYSE. According to the latest news, those banks are apparently on-board with the notion proposed by Sprecher, yet KCG, the group formed by Getco and the former Knight Capital, a major “market-maker” is opposed.

Here’s an excerpt from the story by WSJ’s Bradley Hope and Scott Patterson:

“..Under the proposal, the NYSE would drop the fee for trading stocks at its exchanges to five cents per 100 shares from 30 cents per 100 shares, the people say. Banks, in turn, would accept a rule known as “trade at” that would give more precedence to the stock exchanges for most orders. A trade-at rule would mandate that stock trades take place on exchanges unless private venues offered a better price. Advocates of the rule say it would force a significant chunk of the stock trades that occur away from exchanges back onto them.

Credit Suisse AG, which operates the largest dark pool in the world, has endorsed the proposal, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank AG, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., and UBS AG—which are among firms expected to be affected by the proposal—declined to comment.

“We’re actively involved in discussions with ICE and we are optimistic about the proposal yielding positive results,” said Jamie Selway, a managing director at Investment Technology Group Inc., a brokerage that operates a dark pool.

Last month, Nasdaq announced it was drafting a pilot program that would test the effect of lowering trading fees on a group of stocks. The pilot is scheduled to begin in February.

The NYSE proposal would require approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission and is likely to face opposition. Among the critics is KCG Holdings Inc., a brokerage firm that operates dark pools and a business that matches up retail stock trades.

“Mandating trading on exchanges is an elephant-gun approach motivated by commercial interests of a handful of market participants,” KCG said in a statement Wednesday.

The ICE proposal has been in the works for more than a year, according to people familiar with the situation.

Mr. Sprecher and Thomas Farley , the ICE executive appointed as president of NYSE Group, began discussing a variety of changes to their markets, including a reduction in fees, with Wall Street firms about nine months ago, according to a person close to the discussions. The goal was to try to get long-term investors such as mutual funds, as well as banks and high-frequency traders, to unite behind a broad restructuring of the market that included lower fees, the person said. Credit Suisse became more deeply involved in the discussions several months ago, the person said.”

 

The full WSJ story is here

 

Finra Steps Up Investigation Of Broker-Dealer Order Routing Rebate Schemes; Conflict of Interest Endemic to Current Market Structure

NYSE CEO Says “Not Good” while appearing before Senate on the topic of equities market structure and Maker-Taker Rebate Schemes.

Bowing to increasing pressure from regulators, law makers and law enforcement officials, Finra, the securities industry “watchdog” has launched its own probe into how retail brokers route customer orders to exchanges, according to recent reporting by the Wall Street Journal’s Scott Patterson.  In particular, through the use of “sweep letters” targeting various broker-dealers, Finra is purportedly focused on whether rebates associated with schemes that brokers receive when directing their orders to specific venues is a violation of conflict of interest rules, given that customers presume they are receiving best price execution when in fact, they often do not.

MarketsMuse, the securities industry blog that has long reported about payment-for-order-flow and the unsavory practice in which customer orders are “sold” by custodians and prime brokers to “preferenced liquidity providers,” who then trade against those customers and profit from price aberrations between multiple exchange venues and dark pools, takes pride in pioneering the coverage of this topic.

Now that main stream media journalists are beginning to “get it”,  a growing number of those following this story hope that WSJ’s Patterson and other journalists will shine light on the even more unsavory practice in which these same brokers imposing egregious fees on customers who wish to “step out” aka “trade away” and direct their orders to agency-only execution firms, whose role as agent is to objectively canvass the assortment of marketplaces and market-makers in order to secure truly better price executions for their institutional and investment advisory clients. Continue reading

ICE-NYSE Deal: Derivatives Exchange CEO Gets Icey Response From Some Sell-Side Stock Jocks

Within the first several days since the  December 20 proposed merger announcement between NYSE Euronext and IntercontinentalExchange  (ICE), there has been no shortage of public responses, comments and of course, a lawsuit opposing the deal (filed last Friday by the New Jersey Carpenters Pension Fund).

wsjlogoFor those following this deal, today’s WSJ column by Jason Bunge profiles the mindset of ICE CEO Jeffrey Sprecher, and it speaks volumes. It also raises concerns on the part of Wall Street’s biggest firms, who, along with exchanges, reap tens of millions of dollars in fees that more than a few consider to be wrought with conflict, and are necessarily loathe to put the genie back in the bottle.
Here are some poignant extracts from today’s WSJ piece:

The chief executive and chairman of IntercontinentalExchange Inc., which last week unveiled plans to buy NYSE Euronext NYX +0.32% for $8.2 billion, isn’t steeped in the business of equities trading. But he has plenty to say about it, including some views that challenge the prevailing wisdom and business models of many securities-trading firms.

The 57-year-old, who started IntercontinentalExchange 12 years ago after a career in the electric-power industry, opposes paying incentives to lure big traders onto stock exchanges, a widespread practice that exchange officials say is necessary to keep their markets in motion. Mr. Sprecher also objects to the dispersion of stock trading across scores of exchanges and private markets, a trend embraced by banks and trading firms that earn profits by trading shares away from exchanges.

Mr. Sprecher also has criticized the common practice by the NYSE and other U.S. stock exchanges of paying incentives to traders that are active buyers and sellers of securities. The exchanges say they pay such rebates to help ensure that there are traders to take the other side of orders placed by mutual funds or individual investors.

Paying these incentives has fostered a system that encourages some traders to heavily buy and sell without much concern for holding a given stock—making such traders more likely to abandon markets when conditions turn volatile, Mr. Sprecher said in Chicago last year.

Some industry executives are skeptical that Mr. Sprecher could change the practice, known as “maker-taker” pricing, even with the clout of the Big Board at his disposal. Doing away with it could require changes to many firms’ trading strategies, and an exchange could lose business as some customers shift to rival markets that still pay incentives.

Some of Mr. Sprecher’s views are consistent with those of the Big Board. Like NYSE executives, Mr. Sprecher has criticized the diffusion of stock-trading activity across scores of exchanges, brokerages and private “dark pool” markets, warning that the trend has damaged investor confidence in stock investing and played into catastrophes such as the “flash crash” of May 2010.

Traders say that the stock market is more convoluted and interconnected than the futures trading world Mr. Sprecher is used to, thanks largely to rule changes designed to boost competition among stock exchanges and brokers.

“The NYSE is a much different world, and it’s much more difficult to get any market-structure change done,” said Neil Catania, chief executive of MND Partners Inc., a brokerage firm on the floor of the NYSE. “But we need new thinking.”

The full article is available to WSJ online subscribers by clicking here