Tag Archives: FED

financial market prediction 2024 marketsmuse

2024 Financial Market Predictions

Knowing that nearly every reader has already consumed as many financial market predictions for the new year as they can stand, we decided to wait for the official first day of 2024 to publish our financial market predictions and outlook, if only because Santa Claus rallies that find Santa slipping from his sled during the last day of a year (one in which markets failed to close at an ATH), and followed by rinsing of markets the days into the first week of the new year (as is the case for 2024), can cause technical chart pundits to re-assess outlooks they made only a few weeks earlier. If the first day of 2024 is an indication (AAPL downgraded and down 3.5% and all major indices down .5% to 2%+) expect strategists to re-strategize! But that’s what pundits are best at doing: changing their views to address changes in price trends.

Here’s what we learned from 2023: Nearly all market prognosticators were wrong; at the outset of the year, and then they were caught “offsides” at least three or four times during the year; which is perhaps the only reliable statistic that we can confidently hang our hats on!

Let’s “go to the videotape”

At the close of 2022, after equities were pummeled (S&P 500 down 19.5%; Nasdaq Composite down 33%; Russell 2000 down 21.5% and DJIA down 8.9%), a December Bloomberg LP poll of 22 “top strategists”, had them proclaiming: “2023 will be, at best, a lackluster year”; with the mean prediction suggesting gains of 7% for the year.

At the time, those outlooks made sense. After all, the Fed was barely mid-way through a record-setting rate-hiking mode to battle inflation, and with [most] market participants of the view that we were moving towards an interest regime of 5% (which is actually within the historical 4%-6% range going back decades), equities and interest rate prognostics were certain that stocks would underperform historical average gains.

During the first month of 2023, SPX rallied 10%, inspiring the naysayers to turn bullish, raise their price targets, and get long on stocks at January month end. By the end of February, half of the gains achieved through January 30 were extinguished, and by the first week of March, SPX, the most-followed index, had reverted to exactly where the year had begun. That up-and-then-down price action led the crystal ball crowd to revisit and temper down their year-end outlooks.

As is typically the case, that exuberance encountered a dose of reality. Market participants chose to ignore the consistent signals sent by the Fed (i.e. “Do NOT expect a cut in interest rates, as our fight to bring inflation back to target levels is far from over!”). Instead, many called the ‘all clear’ signal—with an increasing number of strategists pointing to year-end 2023 SPX of 4500. Of course, equities swooned over the next three months into the end of October, albeit by a factor of a mere 9%; a classic ‘reversion to the mean’ that brought that major index back to 4115. That was approximately the level that had been the year-end 2023 forecast made by Pundits Inc in December 2022. And, by this time, most had dismissed any likelihood that equities, as benchmarked by SPX, could end the year higher than 4350. 

chart courtesy of Bloomberg LP all rights reserved

And, we all know what happened by the end of October. Thanks to a compilation of lower inflation and resilient economic data points that discounted the notion of a pending recession, and sweetened by a dovish voice from the Fed, every negative narrative turned upside down. SPX closed 2023 at 4775, up 24% on the year, NASDAQ ended the year with a gain of 34%, and to illustrate the broadening of the rally from the end of October to the end of December, the DJIA closed the year up 13%, the equal-weighted S&P 500 (see ticker RSP) gained 11%, and long-time laggard Russell 2000 index finished the year with a 15% gain.

Some predictors did get it right; select strategists from BMO, BofA, and the always bullish Tom Lee, who runs a firm called “Fundstrat” accurately guessed at the outset of 2023 that a variety of best-case scenarios would come to fruition.  These firms, as well as a majority of sell-side strategists, are determined that 2024 equity market returns will prove positive. The median projection calls for the S&P 500 to rise by 8% (5100), and the staunchest bulls, including market veteran Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Associates (who proved uniquely prescient for his 2023 outlook) believe the S&P 500 can reach 5400 by year-end 2024.  The most notable bears throughout the past three years i.e. Mike Wilson from Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan’s Marko “Kill Joy” Kolanovic remain pessimistic, yet less bearish than usual. Wilson is forecasting a slight drop for 2024 (year-end target of 4500) and Kolanovic believes that current (high) equities valuations, historically low volatility, and any of several prospective black swan events could find the SPX back at 4200.

FACTOIDS that lend [some] confidence to a positive 2024 equity market performance.

·According to LPL Research going back to 1950, 80% of the time in years following a gain of 20% or more have seen the S&P 500 rise an average of 10%.

·Since 1960, in periods where the SPX was down 10% or more, then up 10% or more the following year, there has been no instance where the SPX ended down in the third year. ·

chart courtesy of macrotrends.com

·Fortune 500 balance sheets remain relatively strong; debt levels remain manageable, and profit margins remain respectable, despite a long stretch of higher wages, higher cost of goods, and rising debt among consumers.

·The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI and Generative AI) has permeated throughout the corporate world; leading to increased spending and investments that will [presumably] lead to higher productivity, greater efficiency, and hence, greater profit margins for companies in nearly every sector, even if the bottom-line returns may not begin to be noticed until the end of 2024 at the earliest).

Irrespective of Federal Reserve decisions to continue to pause, lower, or even raise interest rates in the coming year, the yield on the 10 year UST is NOT a long-term harbinger of equities prices; the average 10-year yield going back to 1970 is approximately 5.5%*

Concerns to Be Mindful Of

·Too Early Rate Cut by Fed (in their effort to mitigate risks of recession). ·Geopolitical Risk | Black Swan Event* (Russia/Ukraine; China/Taiwan; Middle East)

·Vast Majority of Equities Strategists are Bullish.

*Caveat: Black Swan events, including the assortment of pandemics, wars, and bank failures, and major changes in government leadership that have occurred during the last three years alone (and may occur in the coming year) rarely cause extended (i.e. long-lasting) losses in major equity indices. 

boj-mischler-debt-market-comment

Land of the Rising None; Fed is Fed Up re Rates Talk

The Fed is Fed Up re Rates Talk…or at least they must be, according to MarketsMuse pundits who have frequently guessed wrong within the context of how much and when the FOMC will decide to upend the current interest rate regime and return to normal. Below excerpt is courtesy of expert debt capital market commentary published 21 Sept 2016 under the banner “Quigley’s Corner”–a daily note delivered to institutional fixed income portfolio managers and Fortune corporate treasurer clients of Mischler Financial Group, a minority broker-dealer and the sell-side’s oldest boutique investment bank/institutional brokerage owned/operated by service-disabled veterans…

It was a no print day today as corporate debt issuers respected both the impact of the BoJ and FOMC.

dewey moment mischler debt market Not so fast my friends…..not so fast!  It’s not exactly a “Dewey Defeats Truman” moment. Still, let’s call it like it is folks – I did say “the next best thing to having tomorrow’s newspaper today is the ‘QC’”.  Then on Monday, September 19th and alluding to today’s BoJ and FOMC rate decisions, I wrote, “Fed Holds; BoJ Cuts Rate and Then Some.” Well, I guess it’s not “tomorrow’s newspaper today” but I still think it’s the “next best thing to it.” The Fed Held, the BoJ introduced new fringy though convoluted easing details (“and then some”) but the BoJ kept rates unchanged.  Two out of three isn’t bad, but that’s why it’s “the next best thing.” If I played baseball, I’d be in the Hall of Fame with a .666 average.  Joking aside, a Fed that infers raising rates by December should have hiked rates today, but they didn’t. This is more of the same readers.  Look for Fed members – both voting and non-voting – to continue giving speeches and appearing on television to opine about the rate flux that has restricted so many from doing so much.  The street is the leader; the Fed is the ultimate laggard.  It’s how it is.  Today was more of the same. No surprise at all.  The government should consider issuing a gag order on any and all Fed-speak in between meetings for all members, both voting and non-voting.  They only confuse the situation and shock markets.

First up, let’s look at what the BoJ did while we were in REM sleep this morning:

A Big Red Zero – Land of the Rising “None” as BoJ Keeps Rates at <0.1%> & Introduces More Shifts to PolicyBoJ Mischler Debt Market Comment

Central Banks from the FOMC to the BOE and from the ECB to the BoJ all seem to be pointing to the downside risks to continued rate cuts while at the same time highlighting that monetary policy needs to be substantially accommodative while calling on governments to share more of the economic burdens. Here’s what’s clear: growth is anemic to non-existent, inflation unchanged to nowhere, accommodative policies are manifesting themselves in new policy twists and turns and big government needs to get more involved.  Hmmm…..sounds like things aren’t quite working out, eh?

 

Here are the talking points from this morning’s BoJ announcement:

 

o   The BoJ left interest rates at its still record low <0.1%>.

o   Committed to intervene until inflation reaches 2% and remains stable above that level.

o   Will cap 10-year yields at 0.00% by continuing to buy 10yr JGBs implying that the BoJ must continue intervening to prevent borrowing costs from rising and to ensure that it can borrow for a decade for free.

o   Changed its policy from a focus on a base money target to controlling the yield curve.

o   Pledged to maintain its government bond-buying in line with ¥80 trillion annually while buying fewer long-dated maturities hoping to pump up long-term interest rates thereby helping banks boost profits. There was no expansion of its current quantitative easing program.

 

Will this new approach be effective?  Only time will tell.  It certainly is a shift in monetary policy to control the yield curve. It is NOT a bazooka by any stretch and more like “fiddling around the edges.”  As for the 2.00% target? Folks, we all know that’s a loooong way off. Market participants have a lot of questions with many sharing that the “BoJ should’ve just cut rates again.” Equity markets loved the news. The DOW closed up 163, the S&P was in the black 23, the VIX compressed over 2.5 and CDX27 tightened 3.2 bps.

“Fed” Up with Rates, FOMC Holds; November Increase Has No Chance Pre- Election and Santa Claus is Coming to Town…with Coal?

The Fed held rates albeit the subsequent press conference was more optimistic, if one can call it that, saying the economy appeared “slightly balanced” and “the case for an increase in the fed funds rate strengthened but decided, for the time being to wait for further evidence of continued progress toward its objectives.”  You all know about the myriad global event risk factors out there.  There are so many that on any given day in our inextricably global-linked world economy, should one or several of them get worse, which is entirely plausible-to-likely, the Fed can skirt around a hike by once again pointing to global events, as they have in the past, to justify standing down.  In fact, in its statement Chair Yellen said, “we will closely monitor inflation and global developments.” What’s more, the next FOMC meeting will be held on November 1srt and 2nd and is not associated with a Summary of Economic Projections or a press conference by Yellen. It is highly unlikely that the Fed raises rates in November given that the meeting will take places 6 days before one our nation’s most tumultuous and raucous elections.  Last year saw one rate hike to close out 2015 at its December meeting.  Santa Claus will be coming to town early at the year’s last meeting of 2016 held December 13th-14th …………..but don’t be surprised to find coal in the stocking.

Folks, Q3 is about over.  You hear that sound?   That’s the sound of trucks?  They’re backing up to print between now and Election Day – BIG TIME. 12 IG issuers are in the pipeline with a whole lot of M&A deals getting closer.

Here’s All You Want and Need to Know About Today’s Fed Decision

(to continue reading, please visit the Mischler Financial Group Debt Market Commentary page

Global Macro View From the Perch of Saxo Group: Keep Calm and Carry On

MarketsMuse Global Macro update profiles perceived opportunities from the perch of Denmark’s Saxo Group Mads KoefoedIt and his view that interest rate increases probably won’t happen during the second quarter, but the market will very likely be dominated by speculation on the likely timing of a US Fed interest rate hike. Focus on the Fed, FOMC, ECB and Euro recovery—and European high-yield corporate bonds.

And The Winner of “World’s Fastest Growing Asset Class” Is…

Below is courtesy of Feb 23 commentary from “Quigley’s Corner”, aka debt capital market observations from Mischler Financial Group’s Head of Fixed Income Syndicate, Ron Quigley. Mischler Financial Group is also an award winner; a panel of industry judges assembled by financial industry publication Wall Street Letter voted to award the firm “WSL 2015 Award for Best Research/BrokerDealer.”

The Big Four Central Banks as the World’s Fastest Growing Asset Class

Ron Quigley, Mischler Financial Group
Ron Quigley, Mischler Financial Group

I had a wonderful conversation over dinner this weekend with a highly intellectual and personable Russian player in our markets.  We discussed Greece and the additional overtime round of “kick-the-can” that postpones pain by four more months.  But what seemed even more compelling was the notion of the Big Four Central Banks as the world’s fastest growing “asset class.”  (The Fed, the ECB, BOJ and PBoC).  Deutsche Bank illustrated in a recent research piece, the staggering numbers of Big Four Central Bank purchases.  The Central Banks have clearly become an asset class all its own.  It’s right up there the with cumulative total of U.S. pension funds!  Digest that for a second readers!  As my friend wrote to me: Continue reading

Fed Does Walk Back On Leveraged ETFs; Now Endorsed in US Govt Study

MarketsMuse editor note: For those not familiar with leveraged ETFs, before reading this special column, you’ll want to get up to speed with Investopedia’s defintion, otherwise, ETF industry experts and observers have new ammunition in which to debate the pros and cons of leveraged ETF products. If you find that your debate with peers becomes too spirited, you might change the channel and duel about the merits of shale oil fracking..

Leveraged and inverse ETFs, which some industry experts have labeled “Weapons of Financial Destruction” aka “WFDs” have come under heavy criticism as potentially exacerbating volatility in financial markets, are not the danger that critics have made them out to be, concludes a preliminary study from U.S. Federal Reserve researchers.

“..Leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been heavily criticized for exacerbating volatility in financial markets because it is thought that they mechanically rebalance their portfolios in the same direction as contemporaneous returns. We argue that these criticisms are likely exaggerated because they ignore the effects of capital flows on ETF rebalancing demand. Empirically, we find that capital flows substantially reduce the need for ETFs to rebalance when returns are large in magnitude and, therefore, mitigate the potential for these products to amplify volatility. We also show theoretically that flows can completely eliminate ETF rebalancing in the limit.”  US Federal Reserve study, November 2014
Continue reading

Fretting About The Fed’s Plan to Impose Exit Fees On Bond Funds

MarketsMuse Editor Note: Below excerpt from this a.m.’s edition of macro-strategy newsletter Sight Beyond Sight..

Neil Azous, Rareview Macro LLC
Neil Azous, Rareview Macro LLC

While commentators largely ignored the Financial Times article released yesterday it garnered a fair amount of attention by investors in our circle. The article stated that “Federal Reserve officials have discussed imposing exit fees on bond funds to avert a potential run by investors, underlining regulators’ concern about the vulnerability of the $10tn corporate bond market.”

Here is one interpretation on why this trial balloon was sent out. Please forgive our attempt at satire; we mean to inform, and hopefully amuse, not insult.

Rick at Blackrock:  Hi Lloyd. Our “Yellen Index” is flashing imminent Fed tightening. We can’t tell you the inputs but this is our internally used proprietary index and is made up of the economic statistics she most favors and right now it is saying the Fed should already be tightening.” (FT Article)

Lloyd at GS:  So what does that mean to me Rick? We are an M&A and asset management shop now.

Rick at Blackrock:  Whatever helps you sleep at night, Lloyd. I need a bid on a 16 billion corporate bond portfolio ASAP.

Lloyd at GS:  We are not in that business anymore due to new capital requirements, balance sheet constraints and regulation.

Rick at Blackrock:  Lloyd, we go back a long-time and we pay your firm nine figures per year. I need a bid now.

Lloyd at GS:  What do you think this is Rick? The 2004 interest cycle? Send over a list and we will work it on an agency basis.

Rick at Blackrock:  Screw you Lloyd. I am calling my friends at Bank of America.

One hour later and a repeat of the same call… Continue reading